Lady Gaga, Timberlake, Kardsashian stop tweeting for charity. Huh?

Pop & Circumstance: Tweet cease is the new hunger strike

Don't get too excited, everyone: Kim Kardashian isn't REALLY dead.

Don't get too excited, everyone: Kim Kardashian isn't REALLY dead.

Have you heard? Kim Kardashian is “dead.”

Kardashian, along with other pop-tastic celebrities like Lady Gaga, Usher, Justin Timberlake and Alicia Keys have sacrificed their digital lives to “give real life to millions of others affected by HIV/AIDS in Africa and India,” or so the slogan goes.

Until $1 million is raised for Keys’ charity “Keep a Child Alive,” these celeb Facebook and Twitter accounts will “die” with a freeze on status updates and tweets.

This innovative, if not odd campaign, aptly titled “Digital Life Sacrifice,” began on Wednesday (Dec. 1) and will continue until enough money is raised from fans via $10 text messages and QR code technology.

“Keep a Child Alive” is the first charity to to use the barcode technology available on smart phones to raise money for their cause. The scannable images, also called QR codes, are emblazoned across the chests of each celebrity in the charity’s “Buy Life” campaign advertisements.

Part of Kardashian’s “last tweet and testament” consists of a TwitPic that shows her all dolled up and ready to go in a coffin with the words “I’m digitally dying tonight. Please buy my life back! Let’s save lives! I will miss you! #WorldsAIDSDay” written beneath it.

Insensitive? Nah. Creepy? Yes.

So, um, how much money is a Kardashian tweet worth to you? What if those tweets were sprinkled with a charitable donation? Would you care?

A similarly silly celeb campaign that turned out to be surprisingly effective was TwitChange, the eBay listings that raised half a million dollars for “aHomeInHaiti.” Diehard fans bid thousands of dollars to win personalized tweets, retweets and followings from their favorite celebrities. Celebs were contracted to “follow” their fans for 90 days. After that, it was back to guarded narcissism.

Which really makes you wonder: how self-absorbed of a celebrity do you need to be to think that your fans will pay their hard-earned cash just to listen to you tweet about what you ate for breakfast? Better yet, why don’t these wealthy celebrities just donate the money themselves and “tweet” about it, effectively cutting out the middle man?

Because then, we’d lose interest.

Follow our news and updates on Twitter, our whereabouts on Foursquare and everything else on Facebook. Or send us a telegram.

Allison Berger is a Philadelphia-based writer and a Pop music columnist for Reverb. Check out more of her writing here.

Categories: Articles, Columns, Home, Pop, REVERB
  • http://twitter.com/elmigno Laurent Migneault

    Hey there, even worst: Most celebrities didn’t fulfill their auctions for Twitchange, namely Joe Jonas, Justin Bieber, Ashlee Simpson… and you guessed it, Alicia Keys ! She won’t copy and paste a 140 characters tweet to send thousands of $ to orphans in Haiti (afraid to break a nail are we), but now she is trying to get even more media exposure by… not tweeting (which is, and Haitian orphans will tell you, what she does best). I am pretty sure that other celebrities that joined didn’t retweet for Twitchange, namely Kim Kardashian… Shame! Truth is, they don’t give a damn and they never bothered to explain. And now those multi-millionnaire stars and their publicists are asking the working class to raise 1 million to help their egos without putting a penny into that thing… Come on! I say, support kids with Aids, but do it by supporting another charity or organisation. Twitter and Facebook are powerful marketing tools for those stars and they will eventually need them back, so they will eventually have to pay themselves to get their accounts back. So by giving to another organization helping kids with Aids, every dollar you donate counts double! How cool is that? So instead of supporting Hollywood Stars and their egos, support kids with AIDS!