Peter Murphy @ the Ogden Theatre | Reverb — Reverb Music — The Denver Post

Peter Murphy @ the Ogden Theatre

The superfans ate it up, but Peter Murphy seemed tired at his Ogden Theatre show on Wednesday. Photos by Doug Beam.

You know the overused affirmation, “Dance like nobody’s watching”?

Perhaps you shouldn’t.

At the Peter Murphy show at the Ogden Theatre on Wednesday, ridiculously peculiar dance moves seemed to emanate from otherwise normal middle-aged people. This included Peter Murphy himself, who, with a sad and far-off look in his eye, pranced about the stage like a show pony. It was a strange concert, but not in the way that a concert by the Godfather of Goth could be; it was a ritual, a gathering, where people could revisit an old hero from another life.

I scanned the audience that night because the crowd was of special interest. Gruff, aged Goths with potbellies shared standing room with couples that looked like they had hired a babysitter for a hot night out. Down in front, the new generation pressed themselves against the barrier, wearing lipstick that belied the braces underneath. There were more than a dozen folk in Bauhaus t-shirts.

This was not a Bauhaus concert, to be sure. What seemed peculiar, though, is that it appeared some people had come that night thinking it would be. Mr. Murphy probably expected this, especially from the moon-eyed teenagers in the front, and opened the show with Bauhaus’ “Burning from the Inside.” I was delighted, of course. I am certainly one for nostalgia, but I usually abandon my hopes with much older musicians. It was a by-the-book rendition, done almost robotically, but it was still exciting.

After the song was over, his attitude seemed to be, “Right lads, that’s enough of that.” The fog disappeared and the stage went from dark, conspiratorial red to jolly purple, green and white. I suspect he played the Bauhaus song first in order to avoid any confusion — this was a show about Peter Murphy exclusively.

As a performer, Peter Murphy is obviously a bastion of a bygone era. He maintains the foppish
showmanship of his semi-contemporaries from the glam and new wave movements, wafting about the stage in an almost absurdly theatrical way. When singing, he often matched his actions to the lyrics — cringing, for example, in the stage lights at the mention of the word “light” like any decent Goth. The songs were rendered in his traditional throaty groaning. He swayed gently, light on his feet, bending in and out of choruses like a thin tree in the wind. His backing band attacked the material with considerable gusto, grinding their hips into their guitars during particularly satisfying bridges and contorting their faces. But I was suspicious.

Peter Murphy’s solo material is not the stuff of legend. It is not something a new musical movement might grow out of; it is gently contemporary, easy on the ears, and just weird enough that older weirdos could feel safe in enjoying it. Because of this, one might think it would be easier to perform. No more rising out of coffins or donning epic costumes would be necessary.

But Mr. Murphy seemed tired– irked, even. I thought that perhaps his touring schedule wasn’t affording him enough leisure time, or that Denver might not be his favorite city. Perhaps, though, his perceived irritation came from his worrying over sound. The sound check at the beginning took an absurd amount of time, with everything being checked three — or even four — times in a row. After the group got started, a strange little man emerged from backstage and
kneeled behind Mr. Murphy to fiddle with something embedded in the back of his coat. This
happened frequently, and although I’m sure it had a reasonable purpose, it resembled tick-picking between two apes.

I left the concert somewhat blankly. I was an uncommon audience member, sitting out the loud
applause and whistling that each song evoked from everyone else. I wasn’t enough of a superfan to heap affection on a famous musician, although I enjoyed seeing him standing only a few feet away from me. If anything, the concert was cultural homework from which I could better understand a generation I just barely missed, yet one that’s so often imitated. I was interested in what happened to people long after their favorite epoch closed its doors on them. I wondered if, 20-some years ago, some of the people in the audience would be able to picture themselves in the way I saw them on Wednesday at the Ogden.

Would they be surprised that they were still caked with makeup and shoe-horned into vinyl clothing? Would they be even more surprised to find that they were clipping pagers to their shorts? Youth brings a certain ferocity, both in fans and in musicians. I’m still trying to figure out whether the loss of that ferocity is natural, or simply unfortunate.

Alex Edgeworth is a Denver-based writer and regular Reverb contributor.

See more of contributor Doug Beam’s photography.

Categories: REVERB
  • Doug Beam

    Alex, I have to say that I had a great time photographing this show. I’ve been a fan of Peter’s solo stuff since I was a teenager (I was 17 when Love Hysteria came out in 1988), and I thought he put on a heck of a good show considering age and altitude. I was a bit concerned when I saw them stash an oxygen bottle behind the rack of guitars, but was pleased that he didn’t come out with one strapped to his back. The band played with vigor, and Peter’s voice was still distinctive and beautiful, if a bit dry from the altitude as he said. As for his dance moves, well, I’m just glad the guy could sing for an hour and half without passing out. I wasn’t there for dance moves. I think Peter delivered what we wanted – tight versions of his best songs (he never even missed a word when that tech kept coming out and monkeying with whatever was wired to his spinal column), and a trip back in time. Maybe some of his fans are trapped back in that time (vinyl clothes and all), but for me he was just one of many important influences in my early musical life. 20-some years ago if I’d imagined myself here in 2008 photographing Peter Murphy while he ripped out an encore of “Cuts You Up”, I think I would’ve had the same goosebumps that I had last Wednesday.

  • glory anna

    right on doug.

  • Lori

    I can never understand why someone who doesn’t really care for a band or musician is the one who writes up a review on their show. Alex, I’m not quite sure why you would choose to attack Peter’s dance moves, or even what the audiance was wearing (and I must mention, I did not see any of the vinyl clothing you spoke of). However, I do know that Peter Murphy gave us one hell of a show Wednesday night at The Ogden and I felt very blessed to be able to witness such a great performer in such an intimate setting. To be able to close your eyes and feel the music is such an awesome experience. It was great to see so many of his fans feeling him that night. Although Peter said his voice was a little rough, you would never know it. His voice was simply mesmerizing.

    To anyone reading Alex’s review, that might not have been at the show…. please ignore.

    Doug – great pictures and great comment.

  • glory anna

    right on lori.

  • Alex

    A note of apology from the author.

    I think the most important statement of my above article was “If anything, the concert was cultural homework from which I could better understand a generation I just barely missed, yet one that’s so often imitated.”

    This was mis-edited.

    The original text I wrote said “yet so often imitated,” insinuating that I was the one doing the imitating specifically. This term was meant to be personal, not a generalization. I am not certain what was incorrect about the statement that would have warranted a rewrite.

    I am a young person; very young in some people’s eyes. I go into all of this sometimes with a complete blank slate– not expecting to attack or praise. In the case of Peter Murphy, I was curious because of my long-standing fandom of Bauhaus and my doubly long-standing fascination with the era from which the band came. I was excited to be there. I got goosebumps from watching Mr. Murphy so close. However, even after having given his solo stuff a listen before, I was disappointed. I cannot stress enough that my reason for being there was purely positive, and that I was looking forward to the event for some time.

    I am fascinated by the audience because the audience that night made me think. I am, as they say, a “young whippersnapper,” fiery, opinionated, and filled to the brim with conviction. At this point in my life, I am wondering what will become of me. I know I have many, many more lessons to learn– about appearances, about friendship, about hard work, etc. — and I want to know how my adulthood will flesh out. Will I cool off after learning some better lessons? Will I retire my more ridiculous clothes? Many would say, “Most likely.” I agree– I suppose. It’s hard to think about so early in the game.

    I am obsessed with culture and subculture. It’s from the standpoint of both a practitioner and an analyst. I look up to my elders and all those who came before me to break new ground; I realize that this did not come through in this article. I will not take back the fact that I was disappointed. I had a hard time thinking of how to write this. I have learned a lesson that perhaps I should stay away from potentially difficult subject matter such as this. Consider this my personal (flawed) history in the making– and for all who attended that night and thoroughly enjoyed it, I wish you many, many more equally satisfying concerts this summer.

    Cheers.

  • glory anna

    right on alex.

  • Doug Beam

    Alex, you young whippersnapper, just write what you feel and don’t apologize or worry about the comments. I just had a different take on it, having grown up listening to his music and having specific mental and emotional imagery associated with those songs and thought I’d share my take on it. Had I walked in off the street with no idea of Peter Murphy or his music, I would’ve probably felt the same way you did. We can’t all be old enough to have seen or heard every band “back in the day”, so you just write your feelings and experiences and don’t worry about pleasing people. What else can you do? Reviewing is critical by nature, and it doesn’t make sense to send a superfan to review each show. In this case though, the photographer was the superfan. I also occasionally write reviews with my photos, and if I worried about the comments I would never get a piece out. Next week I have to review Tom Waits of all people. If I even think about that on any level, I’ll end up with a blank page. Write like you don’t care, and never apologize for not having the same experience the fans did.

  • Matt Schild

    Doug, iF you blank-page that Tom Waits review, Thor the God of Thunder will smite you. Or smote you. I’m not too up on my tenses for archaic verbs of vengeance, sadly.

  • Guido Sarducci IV

    Well, Doug pretty much said what I was gonna say, but I’ll repeat since I’m here. This is in reply to Lori. I believe that the best person to review a band is someone who isn’t that familiar with their work. This way we get an outsiders view. A superfan is most likely gonna go easy on the artist (unless if it’s an outrageously bad show). However, the reviewer should necessarily be someone who outright hates the group either, because then they won’t give them a shot no matter how good the show is. The best case scenario is this review right here. Alex isn’t a superfan, but he’s open enough to give it a chance. Now, i wasn’t at the concert so I don’t know how close to reality this review is, but the review itself seems honest enough. I’ve read some reviews, right in this publication, that have outright bashed the show. I didn’t feel like Alex was guilty of that.

  • Doug Beam

    Thanks, Matt. No pressure now!

  • Loren

    When you bash a show prepare for the comment onslaught. I bashed STS9 and there is like 30 comments on that review right now. That was probably the review Guido was referring to. I say bash on! Then again I am a comment whore.

  • Lori

    I agree… you don’t have to be a superfan to do a review, but I do believe you have to like the music you are reviewing. Afterall, these are Alex’s exact words, “even after having given his solo stuff a listen before, I was disappointed.”. Maybe if Alex’s initial review was more in line w/ the 2nd post, I might have understood a little more the reason for being there, and what she wanted to get out of the evening.

    I accept the fact that Peter didn’t blow everyone away, and that’s ok. But, after I read the initial review, I was thinking to myself, “what the heck show was this reviewer at, because it sure wasn’t the same show I just witnessed.”. For me, the review did not represent the reality of the night. I guess I got a little edgy when the review started off by cracking on Peter’s dance style, and then the audience, and then some comment about apes and ticks. But maybe that’s how you draw someone in, to continue reading. A little controversy.

    For the record, I never said I was a Peter Murphy superfan, and in no way do I proclaim to be. However, I did grow up listening to Bauhaus and I think Peter Murphy has a great voice. I do not own any of Peter’s solo work, and I’ve only heard his solo work here and there. So, I really didn’t know what to expect going into the show that night. Of course I did not expect to hear Bauhaus songs, those were an added plus. But there is no denying, Peter’s voice was amazing.

    Alex – of course, my opinion is my opinion. And yours is yours. I am glad to know you are a fan of music and happy to know you are out there doing your own thing and not following the crowd. Just remember, so are others and they don’t deserve to be poked fun of, even if they do dance a little strange. ;)

  • Ricardo Baca

    Lori.
    A critic has to know the music he or she is reviewing, but they don’t have to like it. A critic is not a fan, fawning unconditional love all over the place. A critic is there reporting on the quality of the show, and like it or not, a critic brings his or her personal biases to the table. A critic lets a performance speak for itself. A critic leaves him/herself open to being wowed, having his/her mind changed.
    It happens a lot, in these very pages, too. If I only sent fans to shows – “OK, you love the Eagles, so you review them.” and so on – what kind of critical legitimacy/credibility would this site have? That being said, we wouldn’t assign someone to review the Eagles if we knew they hated the Eagles.
    Our writers are music lovers, sure, but more importantly (in this context, at least) they’re music critics.
    Ricardo Baca
    pop music critic, The Denver Post
    co-editor, Reverb

  • Lori

    Ricardo, I hear what you are saying. Trust me, I do. Of course the review is going to be the critics personal take on the show, I don’t expect anything less. I’ve been to many a show where I have read the reverb review and I did not 100% agree with the review and I’m fine with that. I felt this review was not at all in the ballpark, so I spoke up.

    Maybe if young Alex would have initially informed the reader she doesn’t like Peter Murphy’s solo work, I might have understood her take on the evening. I quote from a posting of Alex’s elsewhere on the internet “Peter Murphy’s solo stuff sucks” — so apparently you gave her an assignment in which she disliked the artist.

    I am a fan of Peter Murphy’s, but I am intelligent enough to know when to give praise and when not to. I am not so blind as to “fawn unconditional love all over the place”, just because I am a fan. Give me a break! (and give your readers a little credit!)

  • luca

    All,
    I think Alex presents a reasonable review of the concert. I saw Peter in Kansas City this past Sunday. I thought Peter was amazing, but my “date” (who is not into Peter as much) did not. I can see why my bias towards Peter influenced my opinion. After all, we are one of those couples who hired a babysitter for a “hot night” out. As an aside, I also observed numerous pudgy, old goths, wearing too much makeup.

    Peter has always been in my top 5 and is a must see, in my humble opinion. He seemed a bit tired to me as well, but his Voice was amazing and the concert was thoroughly enjoyable. Listening to Peter takes me back to high school, but he is not solely a nostalgia artist. His music and lyrics were, and are, still relevant. His new music, whether Bauhaus or solo, remains of high quality. He IS a must see.

    Luca